Over the past several months and a half I seem to have run across a lot of Development Managers1 who repeatedly and quite consistently make poor-ranging-to-terrible hiring decisions about prospective developers.
One company I know about has had such terrible luck in hiring developers that they're looking at outsourcing all their development needs. And they're a software house! But you can hardly blame them for feeling demoralised and dispirited after numerous bad hires. Or can you...?
I recently met a programmer - let's call him Arthur2 - who was looking for some Java training. He has experience developing in C, and was looking for a basic Java foundation course, but he needs it to be spread out over evening and weekends. I found this to be admirable! A programmer investing in broadening his skills in his own time and at his own cost!
I don't normally take on that sort of part-time training, but decided to try and assist a fellow Seeker In Pursuit Of Excellence, and engaged Arthur further on ways we might be able to work together. Especially challenging, since I am not even within 500km of the same city as Arthur.
As the emails and telephone conversations flowed back and forth, I soon developed a sense the something was amiss. It took a while, but Arthur eventually told me that he needed the training "urgently and quickly". The penny dropped...
It took me back to a day some 8 or 10 months ago when, whilst helping a client with some recruitment interviews, I came across a candidate-programmer who clearly was unable to program at all. A fellow who allegedly held advanced degrees, and could certainly talk a good project, but who evaded and avoided any and all questions about actual programming. Asked anything about how he would design a programme for a variety of small and typical programming problems, he ducked and he dived, twisted, turned and blathered. Clearly he was unable to write code at all.
It is my working hypothesis that Arthus has talked his way into a Java development position, but is unable to code in Java. By his own admission he knows nothing of object-oriented design. I further conjecture that he may be unable to programme at all, and is not so much seeking a Teacher, but rather wants someone to whom he can effectively sub-contract his daytime work.
There are two mysteries wrapped up in these incidences.
How do such "developers" get hired in the first place?
Clearly the managers hiring them never, ever ask them to write code at any point in the recruitment process.
I have seen a good number of articles of late urging companies who are hiring software developers to make sure that candidates write code live, sometime during the interview process. Isn't this obvious? If you want to hire a bus driver, isn't it logical to put them behind the wheel of a bus and see how they handle the job? Why do we apply a different standard for testing the competence of software developers?
The actual form of code, and the depth of testing can vary, and need not be done all at once. You might simply ask for a whiteboard sketch of a solution in initial interviews. It may not always be necessary to sit candidates down with an IDE and some of your senior developers. Even the most superficial competence checking will quickly revela any bullshit artistry, and I firmly maintain that all people are possessed of exquisitely sensitive bullshit recognition skills.
In a sense, though - for me, anyway - there's a weirder question...
How does someone completely lacking competence in a skill have the chutzpah to talk their way into the job at all?
I can't imagine applying for a job as a Bus Driver. Sooner or later someone's going to expect me to actually drive an actual bus. And I can't. What makes people think they can get away with it just because the job ad says "Java Developer"?
Moral of the story? Just repeating what so many others have already said, in the hope that we can get the word out better. And we do have to get more hiring managers to pay attention, because evidently a whole lot of them are not paying attention yet. If you're hiring a developer, have them write code in front of you. If you really don't have the skills to judge their comptence, and you're starting with a completely new technology so that you lack any already-hired developers who do have the necessary technical skills, then get an outside consultant in to help. Or something.
But please stop hiring bullshit artists who claim to be software developers.
They're giving the rest of us a bad name.
Update: Also beware of technical Trainers who are unable to show you any of their code. Another smell of bullshit artistry!
[1] People acting in the role of Dev Manager, at any rate.
[2] I don't know anyone named Arthur, so I'm reasonably sure I'm not subconsciously picking on anyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment