Programming software is Magic.
I don't mean that there's something mystical about it, nor that it is intrinsically inaccessible to ordinary people. Nor (I emphatically add) do mean that it is like Magic. In every aspect I can think of, the act of Programming software meets all the criteria for performing Magic. Magic in the Swords and Sorcerers or Unseen University sense. "Alakazam!" and the Prince turns into a Frog. "Shazam!" and you're whisked away to a far, far place at high speed.
Just look at the facts: We (programmers) write programmes -- spells -- in arcane and cryptic symbol languages unknown to the common mob. Get the slightest part of the spell wrong, and, at best, it fails utterly to do anything. At worst it runs amok and fearful consequences ensue -- fires, floods, loss of money and even life! Get it just right, in every teensy, tiny, ball-aching, nit-picking detail2, and Lo! out of nothing, stuff happens in the real world. Gold changes hands. Trains run on schedule. Music plays and Feyries dance1.
Where nothing was before the spell was cast, something comes about solely because of the spell. That's Magic.
And, just like in the fantasies where Wizards keep pet Dragons and dribbly candles set atop skulls are the acme of interior decoration, programmers frequently work at odd hours, with intense, monomanic concentration bordering on the inhuman. And, like the traditional Wizardly Schools, programmers are admitted to different schools of various arts and degrees. So we have Clerics -- programmers content to churn out the boilerplate code needed to keep the wheels of commerce (and most web applications) running, but lacking any true proficiency with martial weapons of higher degree; Monks -- who eschew the use of particular weaponry but, ninja-style, willingly embrace whatever comes to hand as combat fodder; Wizards -- capable of serious Magic, but forget their spells once cast, capable of wonderful stuff, but doomed to repeat it -- with minor variations -- time after time; and then there are the Sourcerers -- Masters of The Source3 whose code is so elegant and expressive, so parsimonious and pretty as to make brave Programmers weep with envy and admiration.
No, you can not deny. Programming really is the realisation of the ancient idea of Magic. Say the Magic Spell and Change Reality.
[1] Well, anybody who wants to dance, I suppose, really.
[2] ...and My God, there's an inordinate amount of crappy detail that all has to be Just So!
[3] Waves to Ken, Doug, Dave, Jason, Paul, Johan, Bob, Brian, John and several dozen others...
20 April 2008
15 April 2008
Bad. Punctuation,
Tripped across this little quote on /. this morning:
A Linux machine! Because a 486 is a terrible thing to waste!
-- Joe Sloan, jjs@wintermute.ucr.eduAlas, I can clearly see that somebody screwed-up the punctuation. Surely that should read
A Linux machine! Because a 486 is a terrible thing. To waste!
26 March 2008
SABC's website sucks
Email to info@SABC.co.za:
Not that I'm suggesting anything, mind...
"Why does SABC's website suck so badly when viewed in Firefox?BTW: if you leave off the "www." prefix, you get to see exaclty what software they're using to drive their (very b0rked) portal. Now I'm not suggesting that this might render them susceptible to getting the portal cracked, but anybody who has set up a portal server that incompetently has quite possibly left some default logins/passwords in place. Maybe?
"Not to mention that it is completely unusable with Javascript disabled, which renders it inaccessible to people using Braille readers or text-based browsers of any kind; this violates the constitutions provisions against discrimination."
Not that I'm suggesting anything, mind...
01 March 2008
User-interface Reboot
This article by Mr Mirchandani gets it exactly right: UI again ...don't pretty up, destroy!
I have never forgotten the experience of early last year. Our car had been stolen, and we were jumping through the licensing department's hoops to get the old car de-registered, and our new car registered. Well, 10-year-old, 2nd-hand car, since that's all we could afford with what the insurance company deigned to pay out -- another saga for another day.
First we could not de-register the old car, because it was flagged on the licensing system as "stolen", so no changes to its details are permitted. WTF? We could not unflag it, since that would require the police to mark the car as recovered, complete with verification of engine, chassis, VIN and registration numbers. Eventually we left the matter in the hands of one supervisor who took pity on us as I crumpled in the face of this actively-hostile "information" system. She solved the impasse by going outside the system: phone calls to a special contact in Pretoria -- "high friends in low places."
Then we had to register the new car. The details had to get captured no less than 5 times! Twice, manually by myself, the remainder by the clerk punching a terminal. And two of those instance involved recapturing the vehicle details from a form still-hot from their system's laser printer. The system already had the details, yet they still had to be manually recaptured. This is insane! Weren't computers supposed to save us work?
I have never forgotten the experience of early last year. Our car had been stolen, and we were jumping through the licensing department's hoops to get the old car de-registered, and our new car registered. Well, 10-year-old, 2nd-hand car, since that's all we could afford with what the insurance company deigned to pay out -- another saga for another day.
First we could not de-register the old car, because it was flagged on the licensing system as "stolen", so no changes to its details are permitted. WTF? We could not unflag it, since that would require the police to mark the car as recovered, complete with verification of engine, chassis, VIN and registration numbers. Eventually we left the matter in the hands of one supervisor who took pity on us as I crumpled in the face of this actively-hostile "information" system. She solved the impasse by going outside the system: phone calls to a special contact in Pretoria -- "high friends in low places."
Then we had to register the new car. The details had to get captured no less than 5 times! Twice, manually by myself, the remainder by the clerk punching a terminal. And two of those instance involved recapturing the vehicle details from a form still-hot from their system's laser printer. The system already had the details, yet they still had to be manually recaptured. This is insane! Weren't computers supposed to save us work?
23 February 2008
As BAD as Some can be, Others can be GREAT
We interrupt the on-going diatribe between my self and Datapro/Vox Telecom[1] to bring you Good News for Modern Persons.
In the supermortal words of Hubert Farnsworth, "Good News, Everyone!".
Last eve some mishap caused my DSL model/router to disconnect. For some while it failed to reconnect: AUTH_FAIL, it said.
Now, my ISP, WebAfrica, whom I hold in very high regard, has been having an occasional little trouble in recent times with their authentication servers. So: patience is the order of the day. It was quite late in the day, so my bed called, nothing in my little local network really needed Internet access overnight, so I left matters until the morning, in the hopes that the problems would be resolved without any input on my part.
They were not.
So... Onto the phone this morning. Less than two rings! (Contrast this with giving up after an hour on hold last week with Telkom!) Spoke to a chap who was remarkably candid: "Yes, we have had a problem, and a few accounts seem (for reasons we don't fully understand, yet) to have been stuck in an "inactive" queue. We're terribly sorry. I am sorting it out right now [clickety clickety clickety click]; would you like to hold?"
I declined to hold. The pain of being on hold to Telkom being too fresh in my psyche, I suppose. After suitable pleasantries I hung up.
A couple minutes later the phone rang. Same chap from WebAfrica. " I see that your modem seems to be having some trouble connecting. Could we please confirm the password it is using to connect...?"
Well, Bugger Me Sideways With A Spoon! Not only did WebAfrica's support guy sort the problem out instantly, with an ordinary, human-to-human acknowledgment that something had, indeed, gone wrong, but, after I had explicitly said "Ticket closed; I'll call you if there is any further problem." had monitored the situation to make sure that I -- The Lowly Customer -- had been properly sorted out, and called me back to make sure of it!
What am I saying, here?
Here's a significant point: None of us (modulo the Absolutely Bloody Minded) is so stupid as to believe that everything Works Flawlessly All the Time. Shit Happens. We know this. When it does, please don't lie to us and use phrasing designed to imply that we, the Customer, are Stupid, Insane and/or Lying! Please don't pretend that it is Somebody Else's Fault or an Act Of (somebody's) God. (Hello, Telkom!) If you've fucked up, admit it, apologise, and move on. Nobody will hold it against you. In fact, given the current climate of Assumed Corporate Infalibilty, we'll sympathise and likely offer to help you fix it!
Just say "Yes. We Had a problem. We've fixed it. (OR: Here's what we're busy doing to Fix It.) We're sorry."
If it is a significant proportion of the working day, offer a credit for the lost service time. Not difficult, is it? Not Rocket Science!
I cannot think of a way to praise this enough!
This most recent incident is the perfect exemplar of the sort of brilliant, attentive, honest service I have unfailingly received from WebAfrica! I have had a friend[2] phone me up especially to say, "Thank you for putting me on to WebAfrica as a service provider! I've since recommended them to at least 15 other people!".
I kid you not!
If anyone in South Africa wants or needs ADSL service, Internet access or web-hosting, do yourself a favour: www.webafrica.co.za.
Their rates are amongst the lowest around. Their service is out of all proportion to what you pay! (i.e. It's brilliant!) If they ever get bought out by Vox Telecom I shall probably have to leave the country -- and even then I won't find an ISP as good!
In the supermortal words of Hubert Farnsworth, "Good News, Everyone!".
Last eve some mishap caused my DSL model/router to disconnect. For some while it failed to reconnect: AUTH_FAIL, it said.
Now, my ISP, WebAfrica, whom I hold in very high regard, has been having an occasional little trouble in recent times with their authentication servers. So: patience is the order of the day. It was quite late in the day, so my bed called, nothing in my little local network really needed Internet access overnight, so I left matters until the morning, in the hopes that the problems would be resolved without any input on my part.
They were not.
So... Onto the phone this morning. Less than two rings! (Contrast this with giving up after an hour on hold last week with Telkom!) Spoke to a chap who was remarkably candid: "Yes, we have had a problem, and a few accounts seem (for reasons we don't fully understand, yet) to have been stuck in an "inactive" queue. We're terribly sorry. I am sorting it out right now [clickety clickety clickety click]; would you like to hold?"
I declined to hold. The pain of being on hold to Telkom being too fresh in my psyche, I suppose. After suitable pleasantries I hung up.
A couple minutes later the phone rang. Same chap from WebAfrica. " I see that your modem seems to be having some trouble connecting. Could we please confirm the password it is using to connect...?"
Well, Bugger Me Sideways With A Spoon! Not only did WebAfrica's support guy sort the problem out instantly, with an ordinary, human-to-human acknowledgment that something had, indeed, gone wrong, but, after I had explicitly said "Ticket closed; I'll call you if there is any further problem." had monitored the situation to make sure that I -- The Lowly Customer -- had been properly sorted out, and called me back to make sure of it!
What am I saying, here?
- I could have raved about not being kept on hold in some support-queue for an hour or longer.
- I could have raved about the great service I received during the handling of my support call.
- I could have raved all night in San Fransisco with the hot chick on her way to Hawaii (but that's another story!)
Here's a significant point: None of us (modulo the Absolutely Bloody Minded) is so stupid as to believe that everything Works Flawlessly All the Time. Shit Happens. We know this. When it does, please don't lie to us and use phrasing designed to imply that we, the Customer, are Stupid, Insane and/or Lying! Please don't pretend that it is Somebody Else's Fault or an Act Of (somebody's) God. (Hello, Telkom!) If you've fucked up, admit it, apologise, and move on. Nobody will hold it against you. In fact, given the current climate of Assumed Corporate Infalibilty, we'll sympathise and likely offer to help you fix it!
Just say "Yes. We Had a problem. We've fixed it. (OR: Here's what we're busy doing to Fix It.) We're sorry."
If it is a significant proportion of the working day, offer a credit for the lost service time. Not difficult, is it? Not Rocket Science!
I cannot think of a way to praise this enough!
This most recent incident is the perfect exemplar of the sort of brilliant, attentive, honest service I have unfailingly received from WebAfrica! I have had a friend[2] phone me up especially to say, "Thank you for putting me on to WebAfrica as a service provider! I've since recommended them to at least 15 other people!".
I kid you not!
If anyone in South Africa wants or needs ADSL service, Internet access or web-hosting, do yourself a favour: www.webafrica.co.za.
Their rates are amongst the lowest around. Their service is out of all proportion to what you pay! (i.e. It's brilliant!) If they ever get bought out by Vox Telecom I shall probably have to leave the country -- and even then I won't find an ISP as good!
[1] A "keyboard/finger" interaction nearly made that "Pox Telecom", whIch would have been appropriate...
[2] We've known each other over 35 years, now... I think that qualifies as friendship, no?
[2] We've known each other over 35 years, now... I think that qualifies as friendship, no?
22 February 2008
Taking on the Spammers: Datapro/Vox Telecom - Part 4
Mr Douglas Reed, CEO of Vox Spamacom Telecom, parent company to Datapro, replies:
Is it just me, or does this sound just a tad arrogant? What I am hearing: "We're big; that means we can spam with impunity, since we're too big to get blocked." and "Shut up and eat your spam!"
My response:
If anybody out there thinks I am being irresponsible or unreasonable (obviously with the exception of any Datapro or Vox Telecom employees or agents!) please, please say so by leaving a comment on this blog. I promise not to delete any relevant comments...
Let's just note for the record that he failed, completely, to address any single point of substance or question in my response...
We run an ISP with over 18,000 corporate customers and 180,000 SME's and
we have customers who utilise various services. These include list
servers where customers use their own databases and we don't have full
control. The DataPro and Vox databases are within our control and
consist of individuals and organisations who have provided their details
to us. The reason we have you on our Company database is because you are
obviously listed as a technical contact for some of our customers. We
cannot offer opt in opt out facilities for our communication to our base
because the news letters communicate important information that the
technical contacts need to be aware of. However if you want to be
excluded please give us the details and provide us with new technical
contact details.
The other choice is do what the rest of us do and add the user to your
junk mail list.
Interestingly enough this mail ended up in my junk mail folder which
basically means that I received unsolicited mail from this in the past
or you cc'd thousands of people.
Is it just me, or does this sound just a tad arrogant? What I am hearing: "We're big; that means we can spam with impunity, since we're too big to get blocked." and "Shut up and eat your spam!"
My response:
Dear Mr Reed, On 18/02/2008, Douglas Reed <douglasr@datapro.co.za> wrote:
> The DataPro and Vox databases are within our control and
> consist of individuals and organisations who have provided their details
> to us. The reason we have you on our Company database is because you are
> obviously listed as a technical contact for some of our customers.
The (many) spam emails that form the basis of my complaint to ISPA are directly from Datapro and Vox Telecom; this is not about spam from your customers. One spam message bears your name as "signatory".
You will note from my earlier correspondence with Maggie Cubitt that I have tried repeatedly, using numerous channels, to "opt out" of these mailing lists, without any success.
Why don't your opt-out procedures work? (As required by the ECT Act.)
Although some of your technical staff are certainly in possession of my email address as "technical contact" for some of our mutual customers, this does NOT extend a license to your companies to send me unsolicited bulk email on ANY subject.
Further, I will note that I have never -- not even once -- receive a bulk message on any technical subject. The emails forming the basis of my complaint have ALL been of a nature that can only be characterised as "marketing crap". I did not, ever, at any stage, give any person or system representing your companies, permission to send me marketing crap. The fact the your companies have done so is known in the email management industry as "address repurposing" and is considered a sure sign of "spam spoor".
> The other choice is do what the rest of us do and add the user to your
> junk mail list. I will repeat what I wrote to Ms Cubbit:
<quote>
having my own email address removed from your mailing lists is of only limited interest to me in this matter. The larger issue, which it is my main purpose to tackle, is that of Datapro and Vox Telecom blithely spamming, over an extended period of time, continuing in the face of numerous good-faith attempts to unsubscribe, and in direct violation of
1) their own Terms of Service,
2) the email provisions of the ECT Act, and
3) the ISPA's Code of Conduct.
</quote>
The point this: "adding Datapro/Vox Telecom" to my "junk mail list," as you suggest, fails to eliminate or mitigate the primary complaint against spam: the receiver has to pay for it. Putting Datapro/Vox Telecom into my "junk mail list" does not mean that Datapro/Vox Telecom cease being spammers.
To (attempt to) be completely clear on this: since you seem to have overlooked the point:
* This is not about Datapro and Vox Telecom spamming ME.
* This IS about Datapro/Vox Telecom spamming AT ALL.
> Interestingly enough this mail ended up in my junk mail folder which
> basically means that I received unsolicited mail from this in the past
> or you cc'd thousands of people.
Nonsense.
No such conclusion can be inferred.
Having personally administered email and spam-filtering systems, I can tell you that you cannot draw any such conclusion; thogh it /may/ call into question the competence of the people managing your spam-filtering systems.
> We run an ISP with over 18,000 corporate customers and 180,000 SME's and
> we have customers who utilise various services. These include list
> servers where customers use their own databases and we don't have full
> control.
What I read into this is that you believe that your organisations are "too large for the rules to apply". I have some bad news... There are other organisations far, FAR larger that manage to adequately, and to the full satisfaction of the anti-spam community, police their customers' mailing lists and email activities. I am pretty sure that both Outblaze and AOL are larger than your operations; both manage to maintain an impeccable reputation for managing the spam problem and speedily terminating spammy customers.
Of course, neither one spams their customers directly, as your organisations have done.
Part of your (companies') responsibility to the Internet community is to police your customers and their mailing lists. Ways to do this include monitoring their behaviour, and maintaining and ENFORCING uncompromising Terms of Service. Your response suggest an unwillingness to do so. This is a slippery slope. Next your sales-staff will be writing "pink contracts". (Google for it!) Should you require access to better expertise than your organisations evidently possess, I shall be glad to forward my consulting rates.
All of this remains (largely) irrelevant. The numerous spam messages I have received are from your organisations; not from your customers. Your unwillingness to eliminate spam from /within/ is, perhaps, indicative of your willingness to tolerate/profit-from spammy customers from without.
Here is the response I expect: As I see it (prove me wrong?), you have two choices:
1. Throw away all mailing lists under your control, and start from scratch to build new mailing lists. Of course you WILL follow established Internet procedures for building permission-base email lists. (Somehow, I doubt this one...)
OR
2. Send a ONE TIME email to all addresses on your mailing lists, explaining (in full) the situation, expressing your companies' regret that such an unacceptable and untenable situation has come about through the action of a few misguided individuals, and asking the recipients to confirm that they WISH to be subscribed to the relevant mailing list. Should recipients so confirm their desire to participate, your staff should proceed in the full confidence that those persons have positively opted-IN. Any email address that fails to reply, or that expresses a desire to opt-OUT must be removed from your databases.
This (second) option should be followed-up with a comprehensive on-going (so that new-hi[r]es get the message, too) educational message from the organisation: "We don't tolerate spam in any shape, manner or form." (together with a detailed explanation of just what that means.) Your marketing and sales staff may require particularly persistent education.
Forgive my lack of optimism.
Since you (read: your organisations) do not know the email address(es) being spammed, you may be sure that I am in a position to monitor your organisations' actions on this, and will report accordingly.
PS: You, Mr Reed, might wish to consider that a small one-man consultancy such as myself, may frequently be in a position to make recommendations to customers concerning their choice of service providers in the Internet Services industry. Either to recommend providers, or, alternatively, to discourage use of any particular provider. Your call...
If anybody out there thinks I am being irresponsible or unreasonable (obviously with the exception of any Datapro or Vox Telecom employees or agents!) please, please say so by leaving a comment on this blog. I promise not to delete any relevant comments...
Let's just note for the record that he failed, completely, to address any single point of substance or question in my response...
16 February 2008
Taking on the Spammers: Datapro/Vox Telecom - Part 3 - email Ping Pong
Obviously the spammers thought they could just listwash me and be done. Here's Datapro's latest response:
My response to them:Subject: RE: Response to ISPA complaint Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:55:45 +0200 From: "Maggie Cubitt" <maggiec@voxtelecom.co.za> To: "Mike Morris" <me> Hi Mike Apologies, as I can fully understand your frustration, which is why I am attempting to resolve it comprehensively and finally. I am unable to find the e-mail address mikro2nd@gmail.com on the Contacts database from the DataPro CRM.. and you have extracted the delivery address from your notepad doc. Can I please just confirm that the Newsletter was delivered to the e-mail address mikro2nd@gmail.com?
Forgive me my skepticism... ;-)Maggie Cubitt wrote: > Apologies, as I can fully understand your frustration, which is why I > am attempting to resolve it comprehensively and finally. Please understand that having my own email address removed from your mailing lists is of only limited interest to me in this matter. The larger issue, which it is my main purpose to tackle, is that of Datapro and Vox Telecom blithely spamming, over an extended period of time, continuing in the face of numerous good-faith attempts to unsubscribe, and in direct violation of 1) their own Terms of Service, 2) the email provisions of the ECT Act, and 3) the ISPA's Code of Conduct. > I am unable to find the e-mail address mikro2nd@gmail.com on the > Contacts database from the DataPro CRM.. and you have extracted the > delivery address from your notepad doc. Can I please just confirm that > the Newsletter was delivered to the e-mail address mikro2nd@gmail.com? The spam was not delivered to that email address, but another one. I am not willing to assist you in listwashing -- the much-loathed practise whereby spammers remove the addresses of the whiners, but continue to blast their unwanted spew out to the Silent Majority Who Just Hit Delete. I never opted-in to any mailing list belonging to Datapro or Vox Telecom, but was placed on it without my knowledge or consent via person(s) with whom I had contact for purely technical purposes on behalf of my own clients. This, in turn, means that my email address was repurposed for marketing spam. In turn Datapro's mailing list was repurposed by Vox Telecom, a company with which I have certainly never had any business relationship. (Yes, I do understand the relationship between the companies. No explanation needed.) Please take note that this is NOT the only list from which I get spammed by Datapro, so your problems are deeper and wider than listwashing a single whiny anti-spam "activist" from a single ill-constructed mailing list or database. If your lists are NOT fully confirmed-opt-in (and clearly they are not,otherwise I wouldn't be bothering you), then they're spammy lists until you can verify, with a full audit trail, that each and every recipient has positively confirmed their wish to opt in. Any addresses that cannot be so confirmed must be removed from your databases. All databases. The procedure for confirming mailing-list opt-in has been well-established, well-understood, standard practise in legitimate email management for at least the last 30 years, and is correctly implemented by every respectable mailing-list management system. I would expect an ISP as large as Datapro to be conversant with such established, accepted, and widely-implemented industry-standard, and to have the resources to ensure compliance. I realise that these practices are somewhat more stringent than required by SA law, but will point out that the ISPA Code of Conduct (para 28) mandates that "ISPA members must operate with due regard for established Internet best practices, as set out in the various request for comment (RFC) documents and as mandated from time to time by established and respected Internet governance structures." That reads: "established Internet best practices", not "ineffective South African law". I believe that mailing list operation is covered by RFC-3098 among other resources. Furthermore, you will, no doubt, have noted that the sample email sent to you is in violation of even the very modest requirements of the ECT Act. Not to mention the long-term on-going failure to heed good-faith removal instructions as required by the Act. I trust that Datapro's forthcoming response to this will measure up to the full scope of the organisation's evident ignorance of, or unwillingness to implement, Internet standards and best practise.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
